Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 113
Filtrar
1.
Cancer Causes Control ; 33(10): 1285-1293, 2022 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35895242

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To investigate the association between fertility drugs and tumors of the central nervous system (CNS). METHODS: This cohort study was based on The Danish Infertility Cohort and included 148,016 infertile women living in Denmark (1995-2017). The study cohort was linked to national registers to obtain information on use of specific fertility drugs, cancer diagnoses, covariates, emigration, and vital status. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all CNS tumors and separately for gliomas, meningiomas and diverse benign tumors of the brain and other parts of the CNS. RESULTS: During a median 11.3 years of follow-up, 328 women were diagnosed with CNS tumors. No marked associations were observed between use of the fertility drugs clomiphene citrate, gonadotropins, gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor modulators and progesterone and CNS tumors. However, use of human chorionic gonadotropin was associated with a decreased rate of meningiomas (HR 0.49 95% CI 0.28-0.87). No clear associations with CNS tumors were observed according to time since first use or cumulative dose for any of the fertility drugs. CONCLUSION: No associations between use of most types of fertility drugs and CNS tumors were observed. However, our findings only apply to premenopausal women and additional studies with longer follow-up time are necessary.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Sistema Nervoso Central , Fármacos para a Fertilidade , Infertilidade Feminina , Neoplasias Meníngeas , Meningioma , Neoplasias do Sistema Nervoso Central/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias do Sistema Nervoso Central/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Feminino , Fármacos para a Fertilidade/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Infertilidade Feminina/tratamento farmacológico , Infertilidade Feminina/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco
2.
Biomed Pharmacother ; 144: 112001, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34624677

RESUMO

Melatonin, mostly released by the pineal gland, is a circadian rhythm-regulated and multifunctional hormone. Great advances in melatonin research have been made, including its role in rhythms of the sleep-wake cycle, retardation of ageing processes, as well as antioxidant or anti-inflammatory functions. Melatonin can scavenge free radicals such as reactive oxygen species (ROS), a key factor in reproductive functions. Melatonin plays an important role in oocyte maturation, fertilization and embryonic development as well. The concurrent use of melatonin increases the number of mature oocytes, the fertilization rate, and number of high-quality embryos, which improves the clinical outcome of assisted reproductive technology (ART). This review discusses the relationship between melatonin and human reproductive function, and potential clinical applications of melatonin in the field of reproductive medicine.


Assuntos
Fármacos para a Fertilidade/uso terapêutico , Fertilidade/efeitos dos fármacos , Sequestradores de Radicais Livres/uso terapêutico , Infertilidade/terapia , Melatonina/uso terapêutico , Reprodução/efeitos dos fármacos , Medicina Reprodutiva , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida , Animais , Transferência Embrionária , Desenvolvimento Embrionário/efeitos dos fármacos , Feminino , Fertilização In Vitro , Humanos , Técnicas de Maturação in Vitro de Oócitos , Infertilidade/metabolismo , Infertilidade/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Melatonina/metabolismo , Ovário/efeitos dos fármacos , Ovário/metabolismo , Ovário/fisiopatologia , Estresse Oxidativo/efeitos dos fármacos , Espécies Reativas de Oxigênio/metabolismo
3.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 12: 609771, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34135858

RESUMO

Objective: This study aimed to compare the ultra-long gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) protocol and the long GnRH-a protocol during in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm (ICSI) treatment on fertility outcomes in women with adenomyosis. Materials and Methods: This study was a retrospective cohort study. From January 2011 to May 2018, a total of 371 fresh IVF/ICSI cycles were included. Among the cycles included, 237 cycles of 212 women underwent the ultra-long GnRH-a protocol, while 134 cycles of 116 women underwent the long GnRH-a protocol. The rates of implantation, clinical pregnancy per embryo transfer, live birth, and early miscarriage were estimated between the compared protocols. Results: In the study, the early miscarriage rate in women undergoing the ultra-long GnRH-a protocol was significantly lower than those undergoing the long GnRH-a protocol (12.0% versus 26.5%, p = 0.045), whereas the differences in the rates of biochemical pregnancy, implantation, clinical pregnancy, and live birth in women between the two groups showed no statistical significance. The pregnancy outcomes were also sub-analyzed according to the adenomyotic region (diffuse and focal). As for diffuse adenomyosis, the rates of clinical pregnancy and live birth in women undergoing the ultra-long GnRH-a protocol were significantly higher than those undergoing the long GnRH-a protocol (55.3% versus 37.9%, p = 0.025; 43.4% versus 25.9%, p = 0.019, respectively). However, pregnancy outcomes showed no difference between the two protocols in women with focal adenomyosis. Conclusions: The ultra-long GnRH-a protocol during IVF/ICSI improves pregnancy outcomes in women with adenomyosis, especially in women with diffuse adenomyosis when compared with the long GnRH-a protocol.


Assuntos
Adenomiose , Fármacos para a Fertilidade/uso terapêutico , Fertilização In Vitro/métodos , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Indução da Ovulação/métodos , Injeções de Esperma Intracitoplásmicas/métodos , Pamoato de Triptorrelina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Nascido Vivo , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Taxa de Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
J Invest Dermatol ; 141(9): 2189-2196.e1, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33741390

RESUMO

Fertility drugs have not definitively been linked to malignant melanoma. By the use of data from a large nationwide cohort of women aged 20.0-45.0 years and living in Denmark between January 1, 1995 and December 31, 2011, we assessed the association between the use of fertility drugs and the risk of malignant melanoma. Information on fertility status and the use of fertility drugs was obtained from the population-based Danish Infertility Cohort. Cox proportional hazard regression models were applied to estimate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals with adjustment for potential confounders. The study population comprised 1,330,954 women, of whom 86,231 (6.5%) were treated with fertility drugs. During a median follow-up of 21.0 years, 6,139 women were diagnosed with malignant melanoma. Compared with fertile women, women with fertility challenges who had used any fertility drugs had an increased risk of malignant melanoma (hazard ratio = 1.14; 95% confidence interval = 1.02-1.27). Furthermore, the use of specific types of fertility drugs (clomiphene, gonadotropins, human chorionic gonadotropin, gonadotropin-releasing hormone preparations, and progesterone) was also associated with an increased risk of malignant melanoma, with hazard ratios ranging between 1.09 and 1.13; however, the association did not reach statistical significance. Our findings indicate that the use of fertility drugs was associated with a modestly increased risk of malignant melanoma.


Assuntos
Fármacos para a Fertilidade/uso terapêutico , Infertilidade Feminina/tratamento farmacológico , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Grupos Populacionais , Adulto , Clomifeno/efeitos adversos , Clomifeno/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Coortes , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Feminino , Fármacos para a Fertilidade/efeitos adversos , Seguimentos , Humanos , Infertilidade Feminina/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Risco , Adulto Jovem
5.
Endocr Regul ; 54(3): 157-159, 2020 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32857714

RESUMO

Adiponectin is a hormone secreted by adipose tissue, exerting many positive effects in the human body. Its action has been widely studied, placing it into the metabolic health beneficial products of the adipose tissue. Nevertheless, adiponectin has been shown to exert some extra beneficial non metabolic actions, as well. Adiponectin levels can be related to reduced incidence of cancer in obese patients. Moreover, adiponectin has been shown to be implicated in the positive fertility outcomes of women. Some new studies have also indicated that adiponectin has a potential effect in the control of appetite, which raises a question, whether adiponectin could be accredited to be useful in the endocrine evaluation of obesity. Could these additional non-metabolic actions prove its helpfulness?


Assuntos
Adiponectina/fisiologia , Fármacos Antiobesidade/uso terapêutico , Hormônios/uso terapêutico , Obesidade/tratamento farmacológico , Adiponectina/farmacologia , Adiponectina/uso terapêutico , Fármacos Antiobesidade/farmacologia , Biomarcadores/análise , Depressão/diagnóstico , Depressão/tratamento farmacológico , Sistema Endócrino/efeitos dos fármacos , Sistema Endócrino/fisiologia , Fármacos para a Fertilidade/farmacologia , Fármacos para a Fertilidade/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas de Hormônios/farmacologia , Antagonistas de Hormônios/uso terapêutico , Hormônios/farmacologia , Humanos , Resistência à Insulina , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/terapia , Obesidade/etiologia , Transdução de Sinais/efeitos dos fármacos
6.
Biomed Pharmacother ; 127: 110186, 2020 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32559843

RESUMO

Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) is a secondary metabolite in green tea, which has various physiological activities, including antioxidant, antitumor, and antiviral activities. Studies have shown that EGCG has a preventive effect on infertility by protecting germ cells and oocytes from damage. EGCG functions mainly through the regulation of ROS (reactive oxygen species) levels, which affect the expression of catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase 1(SOD1), superoxide dismutase 2(SOD2), and glutathione peroxidase (GPx), has positive influence on other enzyme activities in germ cells and oocytes, and actively alters antioxidant activities. These enzymes above can inhibit the activation of extracellular signal-regulated proteins (Erk), induce apoptosis, and control the production of ROS in tissue cells. Here, we present a comprehensive overview of the mechanisms underlying the main physiological activities of EGCG, including antioxidant, antitumor, and antiviral activities, and their potential roles in male and female reproductive systems and fertility. This paper discusses the mechanisms by which EGCG retards the infertility of germ cells and oocytes and provides a supportive recommendation for improving fertility in humans and animals. We hope it will provide useful references for related research in mammalian reproduction.


Assuntos
Catequina/análogos & derivados , Fertilidade/fisiologia , Infertilidade/tratamento farmacológico , Mamíferos/fisiologia , Animais , Antineoplásicos/farmacologia , Antioxidantes/farmacologia , Antivirais/farmacologia , Catequina/uso terapêutico , Fármacos para a Fertilidade/uso terapêutico , Humanos
8.
Fertil Steril ; 113(5): 1005-1013, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32386612

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To study the development of children conceived from non-IVF infertility treatments consisting of gonadotropins, clomiphene, or letrozole. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: U.S. academic health centers. PATIENT(S): Children of women with polycystic ovary syndrome who conceived with letrozole (LTZ) or clomiphene (CC) in the PPCOS II study or women with unexplained infertility (AMIGOS study) who conceived with LTZ, CC, or gonadotropin (GN). INTERVENTION(S): Longitudinal annual follow-up from birth to age 3. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Scores from Ages and Stages Developmental Questionnaire (ASQ), MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory (MCDI), and annual growth. RESULT(S): One hundred eighty-five children from 160 families participated in at least one follow-up evaluation from the two infertility trials. Most multiple gestations in the follow-up study resulted from GN treatment (n = 14) followed by CC (n = 6) and LTZ (n = 3). There were no significant differences among the three groups at any time point with respect to abnormal scores on the ASQ. On the MCDI Words and Gestures, the LTZ group scored significantly higher than the GN group for most items (phrases, early gestures, later gestures, and total gestures). Children in the CC group scored significantly higher than the GN group for the later gestures and total gestures items. CONCLUSION(S): Differences in growth and cognitive developmental rates among children conceived with first-line infertility therapies, including LTZ, are relatively minor and likely due to differences in multiple pregnancy rates.


Assuntos
Comportamento Infantil , Desenvolvimento Infantil , Clomifeno/uso terapêutico , Fármacos para a Fertilidade/uso terapêutico , Gonadotropinas/uso terapêutico , Infertilidade Feminina/tratamento farmacológico , Letrozol/uso terapêutico , Indução da Ovulação , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Pré-Escolar , Clomifeno/efeitos adversos , Cognição , Feminino , Fertilidade , Fármacos para a Fertilidade/efeitos adversos , Seguimentos , Gestos , Gonadotropinas/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Lactente , Infertilidade Feminina/epidemiologia , Infertilidade Feminina/fisiopatologia , Letrozol/efeitos adversos , Nascido Vivo , Masculino , Indução da Ovulação/efeitos adversos , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Sistema de Registros , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Aumento de Peso
9.
Fertil Steril ; 113(5): 990-995, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32386621

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the calculated difference in endometrial thickness from the end of the estrogen phase to the day of ET (after 6 days of P in hormonally prepared cycles) is associated with ongoing pregnancy rates in euploid frozen ETs (FETs). DESIGN: An observational cohort study. SETTING: Single tertiary care medical center. PATIENT(S): Ultrasound images from 234 hormonally prepared FET cycles were assessed. All the transfers were elective single ETs of a euploid embryo, post-preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). INTERVENTION(S): Ultrasound measurements of peak endometrial thickness at the end of the estrogen phase and again after 6 days of P at the time of ET. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Ongoing pregnancy rate in relation to the delta between endometrial thickness at the end of estrogen phase and at the time of ET. RESULT(S): We calculated the ongoing pregnancy rate in cycles where the endometrial lining decreased (compacted) after addition of P by 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% and demonstrated a significantly higher pregnancy rate after all rates of compaction of the endometrial lining in comparison with cycles where the endometrial lining did not compact. The ongoing pregnancy rate in this cohort, after compaction of 15% or more, was 51.5%, compared with 30.2% in cycles where the endometrial lining did not compact. CONCLUSION(S): There is a significant correlation between endometrial lining compaction and ongoing pregnancy rate in FET cycles of euploid embryos. These findings help to explain why some euploid embryos may fail to implant.


Assuntos
Implantação do Embrião , Endométrio/efeitos dos fármacos , Fertilização In Vitro , Transferência de Embrião Único , Adulto , Blastocisto/fisiologia , Endométrio/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Fármacos para a Fertilidade/efeitos adversos , Fármacos para a Fertilidade/uso terapêutico , Fertilização In Vitro/efeitos adversos , Testes Genéticos , Humanos , Ploidias , Gravidez , Taxa de Gravidez , Diagnóstico Pré-Implantação , Transferência de Embrião Único/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia
10.
Drug Dev Res ; 81(7): 815-822, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32428356

RESUMO

Infertility is defined as not being able to become pregnant after 12 months or more of unprotected sexual intercourse. Female infertility as a serious health issue can result from ovulation disorders, menstrual cycle problems, structural problems, and environmental factors. Ovulation occurs once a month between the time of menarche and menopause. The release of a mature egg from the ovary is controlled with the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis. Several hormones such as gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), FSH (follicle-stimulating hormone), LH (luteinizing hormone), estrogen, and progesterone play fundamental roles in the ovulation process. Both FSH and LH are the main treatment for women with ovulation disorders. Depending on the reasons for infertility, several different types of treatment are available for infertile women. Fertility drugs as an important part of treatment work like the natural hormones to treat infertility. Several fertility drugs can regulate ovulation and the release of an egg from the ovary in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) or undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. This mini-review is about the FDA-approved prescription drugs that induce ovulation in women with ovulatory problems.


Assuntos
Fármacos para a Fertilidade/uso terapêutico , Infertilidade Feminina/tratamento farmacológico , Ovulação/efeitos dos fármacos , Aprovação de Drogas , Feminino , Humanos , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/uso terapêutico , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
11.
Int J Cancer ; 146(3): 829-838, 2020 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30989639

RESUMO

Advances in multimodality cancer treatments have increased the risk of long-term complications in early-onset cancer survivors. For female cancer survivors, these include diminished reproductive function, often resulting in a narrowed fertile window. The aim of our study was to evaluate the use of fertility treatments in cancer survivors (aged 0-39 years at diagnosis) compared to siblings. Data from Finnish registers on cancer, birth and prescribed medications were merged to identify 8,929 survivors and 9,495 siblings without previous deliveries. Fertility drug purchases from 1993 to 2012 at the age of 16-41 years were included. A Poisson regression model was used to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for the use of fertility drugs, adjusting for age and calendar time at fertility drug purchase. Fertility treatments were more common in survivors compared to siblings, as 6.1% of survivors compared to 3.8% of siblings had bought fertility drugs (IRR 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-1.65). A subclassification of fertility treatments into ovulation inductions and assisted reproductive technology (ART), showed increased use of ART (IRR 2.41, 95% CI 1.97-2.96), whereas the use of ovulation induction was similar in survivors and siblings. Analyses by calendar time periods showed the use of ART to be significantly higher in the most recent decade, from 2003 onwards. We conclude that cancer survivors have an increased risk for subfertility, which is why fertility counseling is important. However, our results mirror a more active approach among clinicians towards fertility treatments in cancer survivors during the most recent years.


Assuntos
Sobreviventes de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Fármacos para a Fertilidade/uso terapêutico , Infertilidade Feminina/terapia , Neoplasias/complicações , Adolescente , Adulto , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Fertilidade/efeitos dos fármacos , Fertilidade/efeitos da radiação , Finlândia , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Infertilidade Feminina/etiologia , Masculino , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Neoplasias/terapia , Gravidez , Radioterapia/efeitos adversos , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/estatística & dados numéricos , Irmãos , Adulto Jovem
12.
Fertil Steril ; 112(6): 987-993, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31843098

RESUMO

The probability of live birth from an in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle is modest. Many additional treatments (add-ons) are available which promise to improve the success of IVF. This review summarizes the current evidence for common IVF add-ons which are suggested to improve endometrial receptivity. Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials and individual trials were included. Five add-ons were included: immune therapies, endometrial scratching, endometrial receptivity array, uterine artery vasodilation, and human chorionic gonadotropin instillation. The results suggest there is no robust evidence that these add-ons are effective or safe. Many IVF add-ons are costly, consuming precious resources which may be better spent on evidence-based treatments or further IVF. Large randomized controlled trials and appropriate safety assessment should be mandatory before the introduction of IVF add-ons into routine practice.


Assuntos
Implantação do Embrião/efeitos dos fármacos , Endométrio/efeitos dos fármacos , Fármacos para a Fertilidade/uso terapêutico , Fertilidade/efeitos dos fármacos , Fertilização In Vitro , Infertilidade/terapia , Endométrio/fisiopatologia , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Fármacos para a Fertilidade/efeitos adversos , Fertilização In Vitro/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Infertilidade/diagnóstico , Infertilidade/fisiopatologia , Nascido Vivo , Masculino , Gravidez , Taxa de Gravidez , Resultado do Tratamento
13.
Fertil Steril ; 112(6): 978-986, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31703943

RESUMO

A growing list of clinical adjuncts are being used during in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. Most of these IVF add-ons (such as growth hormone, aspirin, heparin, dehydroepiandrostenedione, testosterone, male and female antioxidants, and screening hysteroscopy) are being introduced into routine clinical practice in a hurried manner without any clear evidence of benefit in most cases. These add-ons make the IVF more complicated and increase the overall cost for the treatment, which is borne by the couples and health care providers. Our current review found no high-quality evidence to support the use of these IVF add-ons in routine practice. Large, well-designed, randomized trials must be conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of these interventions. There is also a pressing need to develop an evidence-dictated mechanism for introducing newer interventions into routine clinical settings.


Assuntos
Fármacos para a Fertilidade/uso terapêutico , Fertilidade/efeitos dos fármacos , Fertilização In Vitro , Histeroscopia , Infertilidade/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Fármacos para a Fertilidade/efeitos adversos , Fertilização In Vitro/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Histeroscopia/efeitos adversos , Infertilidade/diagnóstico , Infertilidade/fisiopatologia , Nascido Vivo , Masculino , Plasma Rico em Plaquetas , Gravidez , Taxa de Gravidez , Sêmen , Resultado do Tratamento
14.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 38(3): 341-363, 2019 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30770286

RESUMO

Several hormonal fertility medications have comparable effectiveness. A literature review was conducted into patients' assessments regarding seven medication characteristics including 'side effects' and 'ease of use'. Medline, CINAHL and PsycINFO were searched for female fertility patients' written assessments of a hormonal medication. The tools used were appraised and common (i.e. ≥10%) unpleasant consequences were distinguished from rare ones. The 35 eligible studies did not rely on valid and reliable tools and did not provide patient assessments regarding all seven medication characteristics for any of the globally used medications. Evidence on medications for oocyte triggering was absent and for induction of pituitary quiescence it was scarce. Regarding medications for ovarian stimulation and luteal support, evidence on general side effects (mostly headache), local side effects (mostly pain), 'interference with home life' and 'impact on psychological wellbeing' was found. Evidence on 'ease of use' and 'required education' was only identified for medication for ovarian stimulation. Evidence on 'interference with work life' and 'compliance worry' was absent. This review calls for randomized controlled trials questioning patients with valid and reliable tools. In the meantime, this review's summary of the best available evidence can be integrated in decision aids facilitating personalized and informed medication choices.


Assuntos
Fármacos para a Fertilidade/uso terapêutico , Infertilidade Feminina/terapia , Indução da Ovulação , Satisfação do Paciente , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida , Feminino , Humanos
15.
J Med Ethics ; 45(5): 346-350, 2019 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30745435

RESUMO

In vitro fertilisation (IVF) 'add-ons' are therapeutic or diagnostic tools developed in an endeavour to improve the success rate of infertility treatment. However, there is no conclusive evidence that these interventions are a beneficial or effective adjunct of assisted reproductive technologies. Additionally, IVF add-ons are often implemented in clinical practice before their safety can be thoroughly ascertained. Yet, patients continue to request and pay large sums for such additional IVF tools. Hence, this essay set out to examine if it is ethical to provide IVF add-ons when there is no evidence of a benefit if the patient requests it. In order to determine what is ethical-namely, morally good and righteous, the question was considered in relation to three key values of medical ethics-autonomy, beneficence and non-maleficence. It was determined that providing IVF add-ons might be morally acceptable in specific circumstances, if true informed consent can be given, there is a potential of cost-effective physiological or psychological benefit and the risk of harm is minimal, particularly with regard to the unborn child.


Assuntos
Comércio/ética , Fertilização In Vitro/ética , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/ética , Procedimentos Desnecessários/ética , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Fármacos para a Fertilidade/uso terapêutico , Fertilização In Vitro/economia , Fertilização In Vitro/métodos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Princípios Morais , Segurança do Paciente , Gravidez , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/economia , Resultado do Tratamento , Procedimentos Desnecessários/economia
16.
Nat Rev Dis Primers ; 5(1): 7, 2019 01 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30679436

RESUMO

Subfertility is common and affects one in six couples, half of whom lack an explanation for their delay in conceiving. Developments in the diagnosis and treatment of subfertility over the past 50 years have been truly remarkable. Indeed, current generations of couples with subfertility are more fortunate than previous generations, as they have many more opportunities to become parents. The timely access to effective treatment for subfertility is important as many couples have a narrow window of opportunity before the age-related effects of subfertility limit the likelihood of success. Assisted reproduction can overcome the barriers to fertility caused by tubal disease and low sperm count, but little progress has been made in reducing the effect of increasing age on ovarian function. The next 5-10 years will likely see further increases in birth rates in women with subfertility, a greater awareness of lifestyle factors and a possible refinement of current assisted reproduction techniques and the development of new ones. Such progress will bring challenging questions regarding the potential benefits and harms of treatments involving germ cell manipulation, artificial gametes, genetic screening of embryos and gene editing of embryos. We hope to see a major increase in fertility awareness, access to safe and cost-effective fertility care in low-income countries and a reduction in the current disparity of access to fertility care.


Assuntos
Infertilidade Feminina/diagnóstico , Infertilidade Feminina/terapia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Feminino , Fármacos para a Fertilidade/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Histerossalpingografia/métodos , Infertilidade Feminina/fisiopatologia , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Comportamento de Redução do Risco
17.
Eur Urol ; 75(4): 615-625, 2019 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30630643

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Empiric use of medical and nutritional supplements to improve semen parameters and pregnancy rates in couples with idiopathic infertility has reached global proportions, although the evidence base for their use in this setting is controversial. OBJECTIVE: We systematically reviewed evidence comparing the benefits of nutritional and medical therapy on pregnancy rates and semen parameters in men with idiopathic infertility. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, and the Cochrane Library (searched from January 1, 1990 to September 19, 2017). using the methods detailed in the Cochrane Handbook. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to assess the certainty of evidence. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The literature search identified 5663 citations, and after screening of abstracts and full texts, 61 studies (59 randomised controlled trials and two nonrandomised comparative studies) were included. Pooled results demonstrated that pentoxyfylline, coenzyme Q10, L-carnitine, follicle-stimulating hormone, tamoxifen, and kallikrein all resulted in improvements in semen parameters. Individual studies identified several other medical and nutritional therapies that improved semen parameters, but data were limited to individual studies with inherent methodological flaws. There were limited data available on live birth and pregnancy rates for all interventions. The GRADE certainty of evidence for all outcomes was very low mainly owing to methodological flaws and inconsistencies in study design. Some outcomes were also downgraded owing to imprecision of results. CONCLUSIONS: There is some evidence that empiric medical and nutritional supplements may improve semen parameters. There is very limited evidence that empiric therapy leads to better live birth rates, spontaneous pregnancy, or pregnancy following assisted-reproductive techniques. However, the findings should be interpreted with caution as there were some methodological flaws, as a number of studies were judged to be either at high or unclear risk of bias for many domains. PATIENT SUMMARY: This review identified several medical and nutritional treatments, such as pentoxyfylline, coenzyme Q10, L-carnitine, follicle-stimulating hormone, tamoxifen, and kallikrein, that appear to improve semen parameters. However, there are limited data suggesting improvements in pregnancy and live birth rates. The lack of evidence can be attributed to methodological flaws in studies and the low number of pregnancies reported.


Assuntos
Suplementos Nutricionais , Fármacos para a Fertilidade/uso terapêutico , Infertilidade Masculina/terapia , Análise do Sêmen , Sêmen/efeitos dos fármacos , Suplementos Nutricionais/efeitos adversos , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Fertilidade , Fármacos para a Fertilidade/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Infertilidade Masculina/diagnóstico , Infertilidade Masculina/fisiopatologia , Nascido Vivo , Masculino , Gravidez , Taxa de Gravidez , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
18.
Andrology ; 6(6): 811-816, 2018 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30298673

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Previous reports on effect of antioxidants on sperm DNA integrity were equivocal, and there is a lack of randomized, placebo-controlled studies. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of combined antioxidant treatment in subfertile men with normal reproductive hormone levels and high sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized study evaluated the effects of combined antioxidant treatment in 77 men from infertile couples, with normal testosterone, LH and FSH levels and DFI ≥25%. All participants were randomly assigned to receive combined antioxidant treatment (vitamins, antioxidants and oligoelements) or placebo for six months. The primary outcome measured was DFI. Secondary outcomes were standard semen parameters. DFI and other semen parameters were, at each time point (pre-treatment, and after three and six months of treatment), compared between the treatment and the placebo group using Mann-Whitney U-test. RESULTS: Antioxidant group had higher sperm concentration after three months of treatment (median: 24.4 × 106 /mL vs. 27.2 × 106 /mL; P = 0.028) and borderline statistically significant higher concentration after six months of treatment (median: 24.4 × 106 /mL vs. 33.3 × 106 /mL; P = 0.053) compared to pre-treatment values. The DFI did not change during the 6 months of antioxidant therapy. No statistically significant difference between the antioxidant and placebo group was seen for any of the semen parameters including sperm DFI at any of the three time points. DISCUSSION: The increase in sperm concentration was more pronounced in the antioxidant treated group but not statistically significantly higher than among controls, perhaps due to insufficient statistical power. Previous studies have shown positive effect of antioxidant treatment on DFI and other semen parameters. However, our findings indicate that men with normal reproductive hormone levels may not be the primary target group for such therapy. CONCLUSION: Six months treatment with antioxidants had no effect on sperm DFI.


Assuntos
Antioxidantes/uso terapêutico , Fragmentação do DNA/efeitos dos fármacos , Fármacos para a Fertilidade/uso terapêutico , Fertilidade/efeitos dos fármacos , Infertilidade Masculina/tratamento farmacológico , Estresse Oxidativo/efeitos dos fármacos , Espermatozoides/efeitos dos fármacos , Adolescente , Adulto , Antioxidantes/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Combinação de Medicamentos , Fármacos para a Fertilidade/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Infertilidade Masculina/genética , Infertilidade Masculina/patologia , Infertilidade Masculina/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Contagem de Espermatozoides , Motilidade dos Espermatozoides , Espermatozoides/metabolismo , Espermatozoides/patologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
19.
Fertil Steril ; 109(6): 964-967, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29935654

RESUMO

Personalized medicine has many definitions. This term is often used synonymously with precision medicine, which is defined as the classifying patients with a disease or condition based on their phenotypic findings, such as biomarkers or genomics, into subpopulations that differ in their response to a specific treatment. Personalized medicine, however, can also mean the treatment of individual patients based on many contextual factors, such as response to therapy and patient preferences, in addition to predefined phenotypic findings. Regulatory approval for the marketing of a new drug or a new indication for a marketed drug requires a positive benefit risk profile and substantial evidence of effectiveness. The indication is based on the eligibility criteria and outcomes of the clinical trial(s) underpinning the regulatory approval. For precision medicine, drugs are often developed with companion diagnostics that are necessary for selection of the subgroup of patients, in contrast to personalized medicine which may be directed at a single patient. Most drugs are approved with a fixed dosage regimen for the approved population, but some drugs and biologics are approved with instructions to tailor therapy for individual patients, whether it be dosing, combination with other therapies, or selection among a class of medications. Hence, more often than not, personalized medicine directed at individual patients is achieved through the practice of medicine rather than regulatory action.


Assuntos
Aprovação de Drogas , Indústria Farmacêutica/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicina de Precisão , Medicina Reprodutiva/legislação & jurisprudência , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/legislação & jurisprudência , Aprovação de Drogas/legislação & jurisprudência , Aprovação de Drogas/métodos , Fármacos para a Fertilidade/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Legislação Médica , Medicina de Precisão/métodos , Medicina Reprodutiva/métodos , Medicina Reprodutiva/tendências , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/legislação & jurisprudência
20.
Environ Health ; 17(1): 55, 2018 06 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29898728

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Subfertile women are at increased risk of glucose intolerance in pregnancy. Based on epidemiologic studies, exposure to certain phthalates is associated with diabetes, elevated glucose, and increased insulin resistance. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between urinary phthalate metabolites and pregnancy glucose levels in women seeking medically assisted reproduction. METHODS: We evaluated 245 women participating in a prospective cohort study based at a large fertility clinic who delivered live births and had data on pregnancy urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations and blood glucose levels. Urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations were from single spot urine samples collected in 1st and 2nd trimesters. Blood glucose data was abstracted from medical records for non-fasting 50-g glucose challenge tests at 24-28 weeks gestation. Multivariable linear regression models were used to evaluate associations between 7 urinary phthalate metabolites in quartiles and mean glucose adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: Eighteen percent of women had glucose levels ≥ 140 mg/dL. Second trimester monoethyl phthalate (MEP) concentrations were positively associated with glucose levels, with adjusted mean (95%CI) glucose levels of 121 mg/dl (114, 128) vs. 109 mg/dL (103, 116) for women in highest and lowest quartiles, respectively. Women in the highest quartile of second trimester mono-isobutyl phthalate (MiBP) concentrations had a mean glucose level 14 mg/dL lower compared to women in the lowest quartile. No other urinary phthalate metabolites were associated with glucose levels. CONCLUSIONS: MEP and MiBP-metabolites of diethyl phthalate and dibutyl phthalate, respectively-were associated with higher pregnancy glucose in subfertile women-a population at high risk of glucose intolerance in pregnancy.


Assuntos
Fatores Etários , Glicemia/análise , Índice de Massa Corporal , Poluentes Ambientais/urina , Fármacos para a Fertilidade/uso terapêutico , Ácidos Ftálicos/urina , Adolescente , Adulto , Boston , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gravidez , Primeiro Trimestre da Gravidez/sangue , Primeiro Trimestre da Gravidez/urina , Segundo Trimestre da Gravidez/sangue , Segundo Trimestre da Gravidez/urina , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...